+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2010-09-09      浏览次数:2233次
Money laundering not a victimless crime
关键字:money laundering

HARARE - Sep 08 2010 18:52

http://www.newsday.co.zw/article/2010-09-08-money-laundering-not-a-victimless-crime

 

In a week in which R’n’B megastar Alliaune Badara Thiam (Akon), dancehall superstar Ryan Henriques (Sean Paul) and Windies cricket legend Brian Lara were in town, even FSS couldn’t help a bit of indulgence by officially taking notice of these “kings of bling” in this financial column.

 

For those familiar with this writer, the mention of music should hardly be surprising as it is — particularly jazz music — a labour of love.

 

But rest assured that we will not be veering into music territory in this week’s instalment of FSS. The only reason for mentioning it is that it made the past week an auspicious one.

 

A day after Akon jetted into the country, something equally significant also caught my attention – government was reported to have rejected a $50 billion loan from a company called Norange Capital Markets of South Africa after security checks revealed that this largesse might be dirty and the company may have been attempting to do some laundry work. In street lingo, Winky D would call it “kuwachisa madinga”.

 

Immediately, I knew I had the subject of this week’s edition of FSS; the substance or lack thereof of the offer was another matter altogether. For me the allegations of money laundering were adequately eye-catching, if not eye-popping.

 

Anyway, as you might have wondered, why didn’t government just accept the money and solve its many problems? After all the loan was payable over a whopping 30 years and subject to a negotiable annual interest rate of only 3%!

 

Imagine what the tidy sum of $50 billion would have achieved, practically overnight. For starters government would have taken care of its debt of $7,1 billion by refinancing it at a lower cost and for a longer repayment period.

 

Secondly, government would have finally increased civil servants’ salaries (it’s decidedly bad economics to borrow for consumption, but what can one do with no other meaningful source of development aid, apart from “eating what one kills”?) and could certainly have speeded up quite a number of infrastructural projects, particularly in the power sector.

 

So what exactly is this animal that answers to the name Money Laundering, which caused government to pass up what, to all intents and purposes, appeared to be financial manna? Money laundering is the process of making criminal assets appear legitimate.