+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2024-12-14      浏览次数:431次
Attorney General’s Office closes investigation against Gusttavo Lima and Vaidebet for alleged money laundering

 

https://lnginnorthernbc.ca/2024/12/14/attorney-generals-office-closes-investigation-against-gusttavo-lima-and-vaidebet-for-alleged-money-laundering/

 

In a new decision, this Friday, judge Andrea Calado da Cruz, from the 12th Criminal Court of Recife, stated that prosecutors have been inert for not having filed a formal complaint against those being investigated.

 

Singer Gusttavo Lima was being investigated for allegedly laundering money from illegal gambling through betting houses, in Pernambuco

 

The disagreements between the judge and the prosecutors of the investigation into alleged laundering of money from illegal gambling through houses in Pernambuco gained a new chapter this Friday (13), after the Attorney General’s Office ( PGJ) chose to archive the part of the investigation that affected the singer and the woman from Paraíba.

 

In a new decision, this Friday, judge Andrea Calado da Cruz, from the 12th Criminal Court of Recife, stated that the prosecutors have been inert for not having filed a formal complaint against those being investigated and ordered the PGJ to examine the case and “take necessary measures in view of the observed procedural inertia”.

 

The decision was taken earlier this afternoon, in the process that targets businessman Darwin Henrique da Silva Filho and his betting house, Esportes da Sorte from Pernambuco. The judge demands action against what she considers “implicit archiving” caused by the “silence” and “inertia” of prosecutors. Due to the size and complexity of the case, prosecutors from the Special Action Group to Combat Organized Crime (Gaeco), from the Public Ministry of Pernambuco (MP-PE), are working on it.

 

This court determined, on several occasions, precisely four times, in an investigation that has been going on for more than a year and which after its launch already lasts another three months, that the appropriate measures be taken to continue the investigation, and consequently to criminal prosecution, especially with regard to the formalization of procedural acts necessary for the continuation of the action”, wrote the judge.

 

However, Gaeco, in turn, remained inactive and silent, not complying with the orders that were imposed, as it did not file a complaint, did not request archiving and did not require due diligence”, he added. However, upon ordering the investigation against Gusttavo Lima and for not having detected “minimum evidentiary basis for initiating criminal action”, the PGJ has already expressed its opinion on the part referring to.

 

In this case of Bet Pernambuco, the Attorney’s Office highlighted “the need to definitively record all the required steps, with the report resulting from breaches of banking and tax secrecy essential to the formation of the criminal opinion. [formação de opinião para oferecer denúncia]”.

 

On Monday, Gaeco prosecutors also stated that they are awaiting tax and banking reports that must be sent by the Civil Police, responsible for the investigation. Only after analyzing this material can a criminal complaint for crimes such as money laundering and criminal association be offered or not.

 

Last week, prosecutors had also taken action against the judge in the case. They presented to the Court of Justice of Pernambuco a request for partial correction against her decision and for the opening of disciplinary proceedings. This device is used in cases of “abuses” or “errors”. The request, however, was denied.