+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2014-09-24      浏览次数:673次
2G scam: A Raja, Kanimozhi involved in Rs 200-crore transaction, says ED

Wed, Sep 24, 2014


NEW DELHI: Enforcement Directorate (ED) today told a special court trying 2G scam case, that the accused chargesheeted by it in a money laundering case, including ex-Telecom minister A Raja and DMK MP Kanimozhi, were involved in the Rs 200 crore money transaction which was not "bonafide" and "genuine". 

Advancing arguments on framing of charges, special public prosecutor Anand Grover told the court that the series of transactions relating to transfer of Rs 200 crore from DB group company to DMK-run Kalaignar TV through Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Pvt Ltd and Cineyug Films Pvt Ltd were not a "genuine business transaction". 

"We (ED) are saying that these were not genuine and bonafide transactions. The other two entities (Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Pvt Ltd and Cineyug Films Pvt Ltd) have no role at all except transferring the money. There was no proper documentation regarding these transactions which involved huge amount of money," he told Special CBI Judge O P Saini. 

Grover also told the court that the complaint filed by ED and documents annexed along with the charge sheet prima facie show that it was not a genuine business transaction. 

He argued that in this case, individuals had used their companies for commission of the crime and the firms as well as the persons were liable to be made accused in the case. 

"The companies are also liable as the individuals have used the firms as vehicle," he said, adding, "no businessman can lend huge amount of money without any guarantee". 

"This shows that it was not a genuine transaction. It (transfer of money) was not meant for business. It was only for conduiting. They had to route the money through others for the purpose of showing the entire transaction as genuine," the prosecutor argued. The arguments on framing of charges in the case remained inconclusive today. 

ED has chargesheeted 19 accused - 10 individuals and nine firms - in the case. 

In its charge sheet, ED had claimed its probe into the case emanates from the 2G spectrum allocation scam and the accused had allegedly conspired and committed offences under provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).